Nonprofits: Negative brands?

Negative branding, often in the image and sometimes the language used, is not attractive to most audiences. It’s much easier to attract people to work towards a positive purpose.

In the cause-driven nonprofit world there are many against something (anti war, anti abortion, combat global warming) when they could just as easily be for something. This sets up a dilemma for organizers. Each category has the potential for a positive spin: ergo, pro peace, pro life, pro sustainability).

Anti is destructive. Pro is constructive. Anti is angry. Pro is happy. Which would you chose? I recall in 1989 when the Exxon Valdez spilled oil all over pristine Prince William Sound, a bright-eyed curly red-headed young woman said there were two camps that formed almost immediately. One said, ‘This is a disaster. We will never recover.’ The other, ‘We can fix this. Where do we start?’ She had no hesitation in choosing which camp she would join.

Eighteen years later, Prince William Soundkeeper, the organization that formed as a result of this near tragedy, has gotten beyond that challenge (but not forgotten its lessons), Soundkeeper’s volunteers protect the quality of their treasured shoreline – for all of our benefit, ultimately.

And I’m pretty sure I see that same woman – in the picture below – still smiling.

prince-william.jpg

But the 900 pound elephant in the room is the entire category: nonprofit. What an unfortunate misnomer! Nonprofits are often neither poor nor weak which is the implication of the word. And profit is not the point anyhow.

Most successful nonprofits work for positive social change, to improve all the conditions of our world – spiritual, intellectual, physical. Some would say they are ‘doing God’s work’ others ‘doing good work’. The human capital involved in their quests is vast, inspired and passionate. Shouldn’t the name reflect this reality?

Shouldn’t the word ‘nonprofit’ change? Ideas?

When you think ‘nonviolence’…

Gandhi

When I conduct branding research for my non profit client, after establishing what the interviewee perceives the values of the NPO to be, I probe to see what human associations the person makes with the values. I give an example. I say “When you think ‘nonviolence’ you may think ‘Gandhi’. 30% or more seem to make absolutely no association. Truth. Freedom. Democracy. Whatever the value, no connection is made with an individual. Yet the rest are passionate about their connections. They are very real to them. Those people are able to think abstractly, metaphorically while the 30% perhaps can not.

Every year on October 2nd (International Nonviolence Day) people adorn this statue of Gandhi with flowers and leave offerings of cookies at his feet. As if this were the real man, wafer thin, walking barefoot across India to create his nation. Yet this is but a rigid stone figure in Union Square, New York, 2007. And the rats will probably get the cookies.

We straddle a seesaw of magic and reality; of compassion and pragmaticism. We are continually putting human faces to abstract values. Every day. Understanding this perception as it relates to the values is an important part of branding – in the NPO world, especially – where values are the essence of our work.

What’s the story?

elements-of-persuassion.jpg

Who doesn’t want to persuade? Make a distinct impression, change a mind? Certainly, the essence of branding is just that. Elements of Persuasion is a brilliant book about how to communicate through storytelling; how to influence others; how to make an impression. Dickman and Maxwell meticulously researched their subject and as a result, tell fascinating stories from only the most fascinating of opinion-shapers.

They provide communication insights about heros Warren Buffett, his holiness the Dalai Lama, Rosa Parks and Frank Perdue (an eclectic assortment, to be sure). Dickman and Maxwell, a professional coach and Hollywood writer respectively, tell us how the stories of those we admire make them our heros.

There are five common elements that come together to make a great story: passion (there has to be strong emotions expressed), a hero (someone we identity with), an antagonist (who provides tension or conflict), awareness (the AHA moment), and finally the transformation (what the hero, and we, by extension, learned from the story).

In my work with nonprofits, I emphasize the need to tell authentic stories, with humor and/or pathos – on web sites, in public speaking and in casual encounters. Dickman and Maxwell make the point that stories, when told well, are stored in a different part of our brain – the limbic brain – the primitive brain – which recalls our emotional memories for us. Effective branding is emotional in its appeal simply because our limbic brains retrieve memories faster and with greater intensity.

I highly recommend Elements of Persuasion to anyone who will ever be called to speak in public, to teach, to make an impression on a boss, to write a letter to raise funds. It’s a fun read, full of great stories, and you’ll take away so much that you can put to use. I certainly have.

http://5elementsofpersuasion.com

Co-opting values

logo.jpg

Quakers (AKA The Society of Friends), who some misguidedly think are either Amish or dead, are in fact alive and assimilated – actively engaged in worshipful activities all over the world. Friends’ testimonies (statements of values) form the acronym ’spices’: simplicity, peace, integrity, community, equality, stewardship.

Quaker Oats Company logo (black-hatted, white-haired 19th Century man) just perpetuates confusion. The reality is, Quakers are very modern, just not self-promotional.

Quaker Oats, which was neither started by a quaker nor affiliated, as far as I know, with the religion in any way, has, however, become holistic in the last couple of years, glomming onto the values of Quakerism into its branding. Like quakers, they want to inspire you to live the simple life.

The newest Quaker Oats product, Simple Harvest is a good example. If you go to their site, they – as many, maybe most – manufacturers, are now on the band wagon of sustainability.

Very Quakerly and, you know what? That’s ok with me. Hey, what are Friends for?

Decoding the stars and stripes

usflag.gif

When I was at Parsons School of Design, I transformed my Manhattan railroad flat kitchen into an American flag. I picked blue fabric with white stars for the table cloth and curtains. I painted the walls a deep red, the floor a deep blue. I thought the American flag was just terrific. I loved the design. But it was the middle of the Vietnam war. My kitchen was a battle ground of conflicted emotions – a loaded rorschach for just about anyone who walked in.

There’s always been disagreement about the original meaning of the design of the flag. Some say the stripes are the rays of the sun, the stars the heavens – imagery from the Free Masons. But then maybe the stripes symbolized prison – a reminder from whence we came – and the stars (each for a colony and, later, a state) the ideals of God and, overall, the freedom to believe what we wish.

The color red may have stood for passion and guts, white for purity and blue for vigilance and justice.

As part of brand America, the flag has proven extremely pliable over the years, surviving burnings, fashion statements and a whole variety of reinterpretations (one of my favorites is the replacement of the stars with corporate logos by Adbusters). But with all the toughness of the flag, the brand itself is fragile.

The flag loses its meaning if the country ceases to rate high branding marks from its citizens (and the rest of the world). They are: differentiation, relevance, reputation … esteem.

Predicting the future of nonprofits

carson.jpg

I, like Carnac the Magnificent, can tell you the contents of 95% of the nonprofit solicitations that come in my mail each day – without opening the envelopes. Inside there will be a two-page letter from the head of the organization with a lengthy, highly crafted explanation of what the organization is doing, which makes It abundantly clear that the need is more than urgent. There may be a petition for me to sign and send back for submission to Congress. There will definitely be a plea for money.

I further predict that I will not read the letters even though I believe the organizations are doing good work. I will, however, feel manipulated. And I will toss the often-unopened envelopes in the trash.

What about the other 5 percent? Those are always nice surprises. I look forward to getting Greenpeace mailings, for instance. I take their missives home to savor the clarity, honesty and confidence (writing and photography included) of their branding message. I get a charge every time. So much so that I doubled my monthly donation recently when they called and asked.

When people are confused about what branding is – which happens every day – I bring up examples like Greenpeace, and MoMA and the American Red Cross to show how clear branding can help push an organization forward and how fuzzy branding can impede it. I tell them branding doesn’t start with a great logo. It starts with a focused board, staff that is well led and motivated, all pulling together on a mutual quest to accomplish a well defined and worthy mission. When you get a sense that those who run the organization have a realistic and innovative plan, that they aren’t just spinning their wheels, that’s when you have a great nonprofit brand.

When that nonprofit makes eye contact with you through their well designed branded materials, for instance, and you gain confidence that they are on the ball ¬– not mired in bureaucracy – you become an advocate. That’s when you give – of their time, energy, enthusiasm and, yes, money.

When I work with nonprofits to help them create a more effective brand identity, I tell them fuzzy branding results in confusion, depression, slow progress, low funding. All the nonprofits I work with are on the right track in terms of their programming – they just don’t have their branding act together. So we enter a kind of virtual gymnasium together (with a good designer, writer) to build up their branding muscles.

For instance, do they have a mission that is memorable? So many NPOs have written-by-committee, compromised-language mission statements that are paragraphs long and unrepeatable. They tend to be prescriptive, limiting and complex. Together, we hone their mission down to 7 pithy words – max – to answer the questions What at the end of the day do we want to be remembered for? What is our purpose? Everyone (including the board, especially the board) knows it. It is included on all important documents. It’s like a mantra.

Another typical problem: Does their name make sense? Recently an NPO came to me about wanting to go national and as I spoke to them on the phone I Googled them. No less than 7 other nonprofits around the country had the same or a very similar name. Carnac says: I see a name change in your future.

The end result of the re-branding process for the nonprofit is a great brand identity and often they make a significant leap: greater effectiveness in achieving their mission – and in visibility, vitality, growth and support. And the sound of envelopes being opened, checks being written, is music to the ear.

Originally published in Fundraising Success Magazine, June 2007

Touching Virgin Earth

r-branson.jpg

Recently, at the TED Conference held in Monterey, California, Sir Richard Branson (a brand in himself) took the stage to be interviewed by Chris Anderson, TED’s head and fellow Brit. Branson spoke about his dazzling career with Virgin Group (which grosses 25 billion dollar, has 55,000 employees within 200 Virgin companies) including publicity stunts with Pamela Lee Anderson as pictured above “It’s a tough job, isn’t it. The lawyers say we mustn’t do things like that.” And about his recent misadventure starting a company called Virgin Brides. “We couldn’t find enough customers.” So it’s going belly up.

Daredevil ballooning and devilish antics: He’s hardly pure as the name virgin implies but that’s why he’s titillating. If he’d named his company Playboy (taken) he would hardly have gotten the same attention, would he?

And the very newest venture for Virgin is space travel (Philippe Starck has designed the interior of Virgin’s space ships.) Is this so Branson can escape our distressed earth just in the nick of time as Greenland’s glaciers melt away?

Obviously feeling substantial guilt over all the jet fuel he’s used up on Virgin Air, Branson has put out a call for submissions for ways to blunt global climate change by removing at least one billion tons of carbon dioxide a year from earth’s atmosphere. He will pay out a cool $25 million to anyone who can successfully prove they can do this (through this nonprofit arm Virgin Unite: the Virgin Earth Challenge.)

Branson was just one of many arresting speakers at this year’s TED Conference, the theme of which was ‘Icons. Geniuses. Mavericks.’ For more about TED go to ted.com.

How honest, Abe?

little-pitchers.jpg

How honest are we about who Abraham Lincoln was? In his time he was not considered an effective president by many, was prone to depression and had an annoyingly high pitched voice. Yet he was also a great man who took the country through a very rough time – the Civil War. He was martyred on a Friday and eulogized in that Sunday’s sermons all across the country. What if he had lived?

Yesterday I went onto a Web site to find a tap dancing duo – Abe and George – obviously both just tickled silly that the President’s Day sales were just days away.

Every school child knows who Honest Abe was and can tell you in the most cartoony of portraits: ‘He was born in a log cabin he built with his own hands’ (a quote from an actual school kid!). He freed the slaves. He was very tall and wore a top hat.

He is on the money, on Mount Rushmore, seated in his own memorial and immortalized in just too many ways to mention – all ways that reinforce his idealized image. In short, he is an excellent brand on all counts – differentiation, relevance, esteem and reputation.

The latest to co-opt Abe is presidential candidate Barak Obama (dem. Il) who announced his candidacy in front of the Old State Capitol in Springfield, Ill. where Abraham Lincoln gave his “House Divided” speech against slavery.

Whether Abraham Lincoln deserved such untarnished reverence will probably never be known. He was a human being just like the rest of us but seeing him as one of us would make his idolatry impossible.

Happy birthday, Abe, honest.

Photo: Little Pitchers, Flickr

Possessed

img_0012.JPG

Who owns Atlantic Terminal? Daffy’s? How convoluted is that? Chuck E Cheese owns Daffy’s? The mind boggles. What were they thinking?

I was in my car in Brooklyn when I took this shot. Half a block back on Atlantic Avenue I had missed snapping the front of the Atlantic Fed Ex drop off store. You should have seen it, yet another garish, ill conceived branding mess: A thoughtless eye sore. The wrong colors for the Fed Ex logo and right below a mosque too! I promise: I will go back and get it.

Speaking of messy branding. Atlantic Terminal is right across the street from the Atlantic Yards which will (if they actually build it) include a mini city of Frank Gehry sky scrapers. Six acres of tortured, warped forms that make me sea sickness just looking at the models. Another convoluted statement! Frankly, I don’t think Gehry should be allowed to design more than one building in any given location. His style – his brand – is too disorienting. And more than one is overkill. And what happens when they add a Chuck E Cheese’s logo on a Gehry building? How does that work?

060616_cb_1_gehry2.jpg

By the way, the answer to who owns Atlantic Terminal is – the same guy who wants to own Atlantic Yards, Bruce Ratner (the project is known in the neighborhood as Ratnerville).

Apple core

picture-3.jpg

Are you amazed? Why? Apple Computers has been working towards this since its first iMac was born. This is the ultimate in branding: It’s a seamless progression. And, as part of their business, Apple has become so much more than computers – so lose that word – it’s now just Apple period.

And, of course, Apple being Apple (innovation is it’s middle name), it questioned everything including the need for a button key pad. And so they eliminated it, making the iphone a totally unique product and once again proving that Apple is the only apple among a bunch of lemons.

The form of the iPhone is pure ipod: the graphics come right off OSX because the iPhone runs off OSX. And, in true Apple fashion, they realize that the damn stylus is a drag and ditched that too: get down and dirty, use ‘the best pointing devise in the world’ your pudgy fingers to make commands and scroll.

This is all possible by using multi-touch which Apple has patented, Apple has already created ‘desk top class’ applications including Google Maps, Apple’s calendar, address book, iphoto and Safari.

Unfortunately the telecommunications partner is Cingular which has limited to urban areas but on the plus side, it’s international. You can bet that Apple’s iPhone is going to be a universal hit.

picture-2.jpg

(By the way, if you want to find a Starbucks in San Francisco next time you are there: just ask your iPhone.)